That Forsyte Woman

TFW 2

That Forsyte Woman is neither good nor bad, and in many ways it is terribly typical of its time.  Were it not for the fact that the film is rarely shown today, I’d imagine we would hear people constantly putting it up as the quintessence of the old literary adaptations; it’s obscenely glossy, rife with omissions and at times apparent misinterpretation, embarrassingly lurid  – in short, everything that everyone likes to loathe golden Hollywood for. Yet That Forsyte Woman is a compelling film, with an iron grip that one just can’t quite shake off. The film and the memory of it has positively hounded me these past few days, so I thought it might be interesting to delve into precisely why.

The screenplay, an adaptation of Galsworthy’s The Forsyte Saga, is not exactly successful. Perhaps the best characteristic of these sprawling works of literature is arguably the only thing that cinema can never really offer: a story that slowly unfolds under the magnificent auspices of marching time. Thus, the screenplay can only hint at the underlying complexities of the many fascinating characters and the intricate world they live in. At the forefront, there is Soames Forsyte, the self proclaimed ‘man of property’ who will stop at nothing to acquire what he wants in life, including people. Irene Forsyte is the woman whom he relentlessly pursued and who has finally surrendered to an unhappy existence as his wife. Then there is Philip Bosinney and Jolyon Forsyte, two men who are also enthralled with Irene, the titular ‘Forsyte woman’. Needless to say, a whole lot of trouble ensues.

TFW 3

One of the best aspects of the film is unquestionably the performance of Errol Flynn in the role of Soames Forsyte. The character is very different from those typical cowboys and swashbucklers that the Warner crowd perpetually berated Flynn into, and at first the marked contrast is almost unnerving. Captain Blood and Robin Hood are convivial and fundamentally good men at heart, but one really cannot be so certain as to the nature of the borderline villainous Mr Forsyte. Yet Flynn renders Soames Forsyte with such care and sensitivity that we see past his many obvious flaws. Errol Flynn does not seek to merely play this literary character at face value, but seems to digs deep into his own psyche, searching out his own flaws and frustrations, and injecting them into Forsyte. The result is an vivid and perfectly intimate portrait of a man – a man who seems to have everything he could possibly desire, but in reality possess nothing but his own bitter disappointment at how he has lived his life.

TFW 1

However, it is not solely this brilliant portrayal that elevates That Forsyte Woman from its ostensible ordinariness. I think, in an odd way, it is exactly this ordinariness – the film’s steadfast devotion to the archetypal 40s/50s melodrama – which is That Forsyte Woman‘s most tremendous turn. By being so absolutely ‘Hollywood’, the movie unwittingly embodies all that is wrong in Soames Forsyte’s life. It is superficially exquisite and overtly elaborate, just as Soames’ life is filled to the brim with beautiful things, but things which obscure only the emptiness that he feels within. It is also blatantly false, like the never-ending appearances Soames must keep up throughout the film.  Just look at the fairytale-ish scene pictured above; one need not be a conscientious cinephile to realise that it was filmed on an MGM lot – it certainly looks it.

Now either the director Compton Bennett had a secret Sirkian streak in him, or all these ironies are just quite coincidental. I don’t think it really matters; what is of importance is the fact that all these stylistic touches add a powerful layer to the movie,  lending it a uniquely tragic aura.  I said at the beginning that That Forsyte Woman is not very faithful at all to the original novels. This is almost beside the point though; a film need not follow the original piece exactly in order to be successful. I believe what really matters is for one artist to be faithful to another’s vision. In its own  peculiar way, That Forsyte Woman does exactly that.

 

Advertisements

13 Comments

Leave a Comment

  1. Good call Rachel, another one that almost always slips through the net. As someone raised on the TV adaptations here, I can ever only see Eric Porter as Soames, Errol Flynn is far too attractive!
    Best wishes, Pete.

    1. Yes, I too was surprised and intrigued to hear about Errol Flynn playing Soames. I think it can be a bit of a shock at first, (especially for someone used to Porter!) but Flynn settles into the role very admirably – certainly better than almost all of his costars. Everyone else seems to be miscast to varying degrees of severity (for example Garson doesn’t quite fit as the adulterous Irene; poor Robert Young, on the other hand, is frankly dreadful as Philip Bosinney).

  2. It’s an interesting, flawed film. As you note, it’s too glossy and superficial, concerned with those very things that make Soames’s life so empty – the beautiful clothes and decor and the attention to period. But it is fascinating, particularly Erroll Flynn as Soames, a bit of a stretch for him. There’s also the miscasting of Robert Young as Bosinney, way too callow and ‘American’ for the role. Had this film been made 10 years earlier, or even just 5 years earlier, Flynn would no doubt have been cast in the Bosinney role and would probably have been ideal in it.

    1. You’re certainly right about Young, and the idea of Flynn playing Bosinney is definitely an enticing one. For what it’s worth though, I do think Errol Flynn is unexpectedly compelling as Soames. (By the way, your comment has actually just sown the seeds of a kind of ‘Colonel Blimp’ scenario in my head, with Flynn playing Soames, Philip and Jolyon – personally, I think he could’ve just about pulled it off! We would though, of course, be left with an exceedingly weird movie…)

  3. I never knew Flynn had done this: I thought ALL his performances were … well, swashbuckling, I suppose. Marvellous titbits I pick up from you ! :-)

    1. During the twilight of his career, Errol Flynn began to shed his ‘swashbuckler’ (that word just fits him to a T!) image and matured into more unsympathetic and darker roles. Personally, I think Soames Forsyte is one of his best performances – apparently it was one of Flynn’s favourites as well. Although most of the films of this period are not exceptional, unobscured by the green tights and the daring swordplay, Flynn does reveal himself to be a very capable actor.

      Thanks for stopping by MR! – Rachel

      1. Fairly wasted career, then, poor bastard. That’s what comes of typecasting, of course: so many actors must have been driven MAD by the Hollywood typecasting attitude …
        The character of Soames is so challenging, and yet I feel that Damien Lewis was able to make him an almost sympathetic character …

  4. Rachel, Smiling I can’t say I have ever seen it, nor am I likely to now after reading your review. I suspect the best thing I would get out of this movie is your review. But I love reading your analysis of movies, I so enjoy how you dig deeply into the effort, the time elements, plots and subplots, I can honetly say when I go to a movie, that I pay more attention. Thank you for that. Take care, Bill

    1. Thanks Bill, your comments are always lovely. I am happy to hear that you enjoy these little essays, and that now you watch films more carefully – I hope this adds to your enjoyment of the movies you see.

  5. Thanks for your ever-insightful reviews. The Forsyte Saga (the trilogy) ranks among my all-time favourite works of literature and I really think it is essential reading for anyone who can comprehend English. Not the sort of work that lends itself to feature film though. Given the modern craze for detailed TV, I think it is a great candidate for a 3-season small-screen adaptation.

    1. I agree that The Forsyte Saga, like many other great (both in quality and in actual length) works of literature, seems to have always been destined for the small-screen. Both the 1967 and 2002 versions are noble efforts, particularly because of the fact they too share that very important sense of passing time which made the original material so potent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s